What are the positive adjective actions?

What are the actions committed by a person: romantic actions of a man

An act is a conscious action, assessed as an act of moral self-determination of a person, in which he asserts himself as an individual in his relationship to another person, himself, a group or society, and nature as a whole.
P. is the basic unit of social behavior. It reveals and shapes a person’s personality. The implementation of P. is preceded by an internal plan of action, in which a consciously developed intention is presented, there is a forecast of the expected result and consequences for surrounding individuals and society as a whole. P. can be expressed by action or inaction; position expressed in words; an attitude towards something, formalized in the form of a gesture, a look, a tone of speech, a semantic subtext; in action aimed at overcoming physical obstacles and searching for truth. When assessing P., it is necessary to take into account the system of social norms accepted in a given society. To evaluate P., the moral meaning of an action is important; the action itself should be considered as a way of implementing P. in a specific situation. P. are included in the system of moral relations of society, and through the latter - in the system of all social relations. The purpose of an action is what a person wants to get by performing this or that action. At first glance, the concepts of motive and purpose may seem similar, but in reality they are very different from each other. A motive is what is the initial reason for performing an action, while a goal is the final result towards which the person performing the action moves. It is goals that can determine whether actions are good or bad. For example, this can be done by looking at whether the interests of the person performing the action coincide with the interests of the people around him. If interests coincide, then the action may be good, but if this does not happen, then the action will definitely be bad and selfish. Naturally, there is no categoricalness here, so interests often partially coincide. Accordingly, there are not only good and bad deeds, but in any case every person knows this.

Real masculine actions

What actions can you do for a girl?

Modern trends in the emancipation of women have led to a confusion of roles and expected actions.

This gave rise to a new direction of behavior in which women's and men's actions were no longer assessed from different points of view, and also individual and gender differences ceased to be taken into account.

Under the current conditions, expected and actual male actions have become very far from each other .

However, not all women skillfully cope with the increased pressure and burden of modern society: a girl is expected to work throughout her life, and also take care of home and family at the same time.

Women find it difficult to choose between professional and personal life due to the difficulties of implementing both paths.

And the first truly masculine act towards a girl is to help determine this path, which can be a horribly difficult choice for a woman.

You can create conditions for a comfortable working environment for a girl, both as a life partner or spouse, taking on financial concerns and solving problems , and as a boss and employee, distributing responsibilities taking into account the possible family life of the employee.

These actions will greatly facilitate the modern life of the female population.

An important act in the life of any man is creating a family.

This action has all the qualities of an act and requires awareness and responsibility.

Often men are lost in front of this thought and cannot decide to take real action, but for a girl this step means recognition of her role as a future mother and companion in life.

This act also entails a number of others: help in solving difficulties, protection in difficult domestic and financial conditions, and so on.

A man's ability to keep his word is also a characteristic point that can be achieved for a girl. The value of a word is determined precisely by the correspondence of expressed intentions and actions.

Modern girls recognize these actions as very romantic - when a man does not waste words and is responsible for them. And this quality truly deserves to be a sign of a real man.

In addition to such fundamental decisions, there are various other small actions that help express your attitude towards a girl . Such processes include:

help with housework;
small tokens or gifts;
shopping trips together;
assistance in choosing clothes and interior items;
transport assistance (car repair, moving by car - giving a ride or picking up from work, and so on);
communication with relatives.

The set of actions that can be performed for a girl is often determined only by a man’s desire and attitude .

Small actions cannot be neglected; they play no less important role than other significant actions.

Forms

What are they? The action can be presented in the following forms :

activity or inactivity;
expression of verbal attitude, point of view, position;
physical expression of attitude through facial expressions and gestures;
a set of actions aimed at overcoming emerging difficulties in achieving a goal.

These steps always have a component of meaning. This distinguishes them from reflexive impulses, automatic patterns of behavior.

The latter include conditional “politeness” in behavior , which is often attributed to residents of Europe and America: their behavior is not aimed at giving pleasure to the interlocutor or expressing approval, but is an automated “form” of communication accepted in society.

Thus, the purpose and direction of behavior constitute a significant part of the definition of an action.

The action is also characterized by responsibility . That is, the individual is aware of and accepts the possible consequences. Understanding these processes and vice versa characterizes the personality from the side of consciousness.

They are characterized by feasibility and realism. This means, at least potentially, the possibility of their implementation.

Kinds

Actions are influenced by social norms, family traditions, and personal attitudes.

In its development, an action goes from a mental representation to implementation by action .

At the same time, not all actions end with this action; for various reasons, the action can “break off” in the middle of the path. Such unfinished actions form the basis for the formation of personal dissatisfaction and are subject to careful psychological analysis.

The expected steps are also highlighted . Certain social roles: in the family, in the work team, in personal relationships impose certain expectations from activities. This also includes gender distribution of roles. From here, expected and unexpected actions are distinguished.

There are characteristic and uncharacteristic manifestations for a person, depending on the type of character, age, and gender.

For example, it is typical for a schoolchild to act quickly and rashly, while in adulthood this is a manifestation of infantility. That is, a certain set of actions characterizes the stage of personality development.

According to the degree of responsibility, such activities are divided into responsible and irresponsible. The main criterion is awareness of the consequences and interaction with them.

As a rule, this is associated with certain difficulties in implementation, hence irresponsible actions are much more common.

They also characterize the degree of maturity of the individual .

The concept of responsibility includes both awareness of one’s actions, anticipation of the situation, and the ability to make decisions in these situations.

Responsibility of actions is of great importance in work teams for managers and in family relationships for men. These categories of people are expected to take responsible steps.

From the point of view of morality and morality, they are divided into moral and immoral. Immoral acts form the basis of deviant behavior and are condemned not only by society, but, as a rule, by the law.

The interpretation of the concept of morality is dynamic - for example, the sharp condemnation of premarital relations in Tsarist Russia and freedom of choice in modern society.

However, some aspects remain more conservative in certain segments of the population, as well as ethnic groups.

Facilities

An action is never done just like that; to accomplish it, a person needs certain means. And if you don’t see these funds, it doesn’t mean they don’t exist. The means can be very varied, verbal or practical. Examples of actions that use practical means are numerous. This could be going to the store, playing football, or cleaning the apartment. An act that uses verbal means is a little more complex. It does not include action as such and is based only on speech. However, this does not mean that any statement cannot be an action: a motivational speech or a call to save stray animals is already an action that characterizes a person from one side or another.

Typology

In a broad sense, the psychological category we are considering is divided into two large groups - template and initiative.
However, it is not limited to these varieties. It must satisfy human needs and not violate the moral principle. Such social behavior is normal and does not violate moral requirements or the interests of other individuals. We recommend: Prejudices are

If a person commits actions that go against the norms accepted by all people, his behavior will be considered deviant. The causes of deviant behavior fall into three broad categories. They are presented in the following types:

Individual – mental illnesses, violations of proper family education, etc.
Socio-psychological – communication in a dysfunctional social environment.
Macrosocial are reasons that are caused by the social and cultural development of society.

Types of deviant behavior, by and large, can be reduced to the following: alcoholism, drug addiction, substance abuse, vagrancy, breaking laws, harming oneself and other people. There are many reasons for this, and usually it is a complex of factors: personality traits, unfavorable surrounding atmosphere (both in the family and in other social groups).

However, it also happens that types of social behavior that deviate from the norm do not bring anything bad to society and have positive features - in such cases it cannot be said that this is incorrect behavior. This, for example, could be charity, genius, holiness, asceticism, etc.

What is the action:

Hello! My name is Lampobot, I am a computer program that helps you make Word Maps. I can count perfectly, but I still don’t understand very well how your world works. Help me figure it out!

Thank you!

I began to understand the world of emotions a little better.

Question: sweat

- is it something neutral, positive or negative?

Neutral Positive Negative I don’t know

Associations to the word “action”

Synonyms for the word "deed"

Sentences containing the word "action"

After doing good deeds,
a person feels euphoria and a sense of peace. This phenomenon is so common that it even received a special name in medicine.

Quotes from Russian classics with the word “deed”

This act of
Madame de Meugene is undoubtedly punishable, but taking into account that the accused was forced to do this by the outrageous behavior of the insulted person himself and that she was in a state of self-forgetfulness from the insult inflicted, she cannot be blamed for her
act
, much less punished for him.

The meaning of the word "action"

ACTION, -pka, m.

An intentional action done by someone.
A selfless act.
(Small Academic Dictionary, MAS)

Aphorisms of Russian writers with the word “deed”

Think well - and your thoughts will ripen into good deeds.

Submit Comment

Additionally

The meaning of the word "action"

ACTION, -pka, m.

An intentional action done by someone.
A selfless act.

Sentences containing the word "action"

After good deeds

the person feels euphoria and a sense of peace. This phenomenon is so common that it even received a special name in medicine.

True, every now and then one of them committed a rash act

, flying too close, and then from her example the others learned to be more careful.

Some students admired those angels who decide on such self-sacrifice, others considered such an act

thoughtless.

Actions are. Human actions - definition, features and types

Every person in his life every day performs a number of different actions. But do you know what actions are? This question seems quite simple, but if you think about it, few people know the definition of the concept “action”. It is everyday, in one day you may well mention it several times and hear it even more times, but you will never think about what exactly was meant. That is why you should carefully study this article. From it you will learn not only what actions are, but also what types and characteristics they have, which include a number of components. Naturally, in real life this information will not be too useful for you. After all, everyone knows that actions are actions that a person performs. However, to expand your horizons, you should still get into this topic.

Sophists vs Socrates

The philosophy of Socrates tried to explain the essence of the concept of “action”: what is it? The motivating component of his action is the opposite of the position of the sophists, who teach to find out their hidden motives, giving them the status of conscious ones. According to Protagoras, who was a contemporary of Socrates, the meaning of human life as an individual is a clear and successful expression with the ultimate satisfaction of personal desires and needs.

The Sophists believed that every action of a selfish motive must be justified in the eyes of relatives and other people, since they are part of society. Therefore, the environment needs to be convinced, using sophistic technologies of speech construction, that it is necessary for them. That is, the young man who accepted sophistic views learned not only to know himself, but also, having set a certain goal, achieve it and prove that he was right under any circumstances.

What is an action?

So, first of all, you need to understand what actions are. It would seem that the question is very simple and banal; many people will laugh when they hear it. But if they think for a minute, they will realize that they cannot give an exact answer. Yes, actions are human actions, but in this case, how do actions differ from actions? The answer, by the way, is quite simple. After all, an act is a conscious and only conscious action that a person performs of his own free will. Thus, the act is the embodiment of the realization of an act of free will. Actions are very closely related to a person’s character. After all, they are a reflection of a person’s character traits in the real world. Very often, psychologists define them as a person’s assertion of himself as a specific individual. As you can see, actions are a very important thing about which it is worth knowing more details. For example, what types of actions are there, what characteristics they have, and so on.

What is it: definition

One of the founders of psychological science, L.S. Vygotsky. defined an act as a form of personal behavior realized during the period of development.

Moreover, the action was not something intuitive or reflexive , but went through all stages of awareness and development of principles of action.

That is, according to Vygotsky, an act is a form of conscious personal behavior.

In the definition of practical psychologist Golovin, an act is an act of a person’s relationship to external phenomena and objects, which is performed consciously and by choice. That is, the action acquires the features of personal self-determination.

In this case, an action can be either successful or unsuccessful , but in both cases it will show a positive result: inaction in this case will not be a failure, since it also expresses a certain attitude towards the world and personality traits.

In the definition of the Oxford scientist Murray, an act is only an element of human behavior. This element signifies a chain of relationships between people and the world around them, a structural component of a more complex pattern of behavior.

In Russian psychology, this impulse is interpreted somewhat more broadly. It represents the core of social activity, which determines the behavior of the individual in society and its main directions.

Types of actions

A person's actions cannot be attributed to one level, because they are very different. There are several types of behavior that you should pay attention to in order to understand this issue.

The very first type is a reflex. Many people may think that a reflex does not apply to an action because it is not conscious, but they would be wrong. Indeed, a reflex is not a conscious action, it is an unconscious reaction to an external stimulus, but the message to action comes from within. That is, if the sun is shining in your face, you reflexively raise your hand to close your eyes, and if any object flies at you, you reflexively step aside. This is a basic level of behavior that describes only basic instincts. But reflexes are still actions, since at the most banal level they describe certain aspects of a person’s character. If we take the example of the same flying object, different people may have different reflexes: someone will try to catch the object, someone will try to dodge it, someone will kick it, and so on.

The next type of action is instinct. This is an emotional and purposeful action, which is distinguished by the fact that a person performs it consciously, but at the same time is not aware of the results that he will receive as a result. A person eats because instinct tells him to do so - he does not need to remind himself every time that he needs to have lunch so as not to die of hunger.

The most common type of action is conscious action. In this case, a person not only consciously commits a certain act, he also knows what the consequences of this action will be, and also strives to obtain a specific result. It is precisely such actions that reveal to a greater extent the character of the person committing them.

As you can see, a person’s actions can be divided into several different types, which will characterize this or that person in their own way. What else can you tell about actions? For example, you can look at what characteristics they have, that is, what components can be identified in their actions.

Essay on the topic Deed

All people are different. Their thoughts and experiences are different. And actions are also very different. In my opinion, people's actions depend on their emotions. When a person is upset, offended by someone and angry, he is capable of doing any desperate act: setting someone up, betraying someone, offending someone in return.

A kind and happy person wants to give people joy. Every evil deed can be compensated by a good deed, and this is perfectly confirmed by real life.

My neighbors got themselves a cat. Their little child constantly begged for a pet and really asked to give him a gift. The boy promised that he would look after the pet and take care of it, but the parents could not stand it. One day they brought the child the desired gift.

I remember how happy that boy was! The parents did a real good thing and made their child happy. However, very little time passed, and we accidentally learned that the neighbors no longer wanted to take care of the animal.

They argued that the child is absolutely indifferent to his pet, does not play with him, and forgets to feed him. But the parents agreed to take him only if the boy took care of all matters of custody!

And they did very badly. They just threw the kitten outside!

Of course, they didn’t throw him out the window or put him out the door, but kindly made a bed for him in the entrance and put a bowl for him to eat. I didn't expect this from them! They seemed such sincere and kind people!

In addition, it always seemed to me that all people in the world should understand what responsibility they take upon themselves when they decide to adopt an animal. It turned out that I was very mistaken. I witnessed a very bad act. All the neighbors were very surprised, many were indignant: where has it been seen that normal people would put a kitten outside?

Bad deeds are always compensated by good ones. This is the law of our nature. If bad deeds dominated our lives, we would be deeply unhappy. I couldn’t listen to this meowing in our entrance.

My heart was torn with regret!

And I started talking to my mother about adopting the kitten. Mom was categorically against it. She was afraid that the story with the boy would repeat itself, that I would get tired of the animal and there would be no one to care for him. I told my mother about all the lessons of kindness that they teach us at school, about doing good, taking care of our little brothers...

And mom gave up. She made a sincere promise from me and allowed me to bring the kitten home.

I took the frightened kitten in my arms and hugged him tightly, I promised the little bundle never to leave him. This is how a bad deed was covered by a good deed, albeit mine.

The neighbors looked at me suspiciously, but didn’t say anything, didn’t ask. Sometimes the boy who gave up the little animal asked me how the cat was doing. I invited him to visit so that he could see for himself, but he always refused. I think his conscience has awakened. He could not look into the small eyes of the kitten he had abandoned.

People's actions are very different. Some people do evil without thinking about the consequences, that someone will suffer as a result of such actions. And good deeds make both people and animals happy.

I wish there were more good deeds in the world, although I know that evil will never completely disappear. Only because it exists do we know what good is. Everything in life should be harmonious. This is how our whole nature works, which created us and of which we are all a part.

Motive

The first feature of actions is a motive, that is, something that motivates a person to perform a particular action. Every committed action has its own motive. Even reflexes have it, although it is subconscious. Unmotivated actions are a deviation from the norm, and if a person commits them, then he needs the help of a psychologist or even a psychiatrist. However, motive is far from the only component that every perfect action has.

The purpose of an action is what a person wants to get by performing this or that action. At first glance, the concepts of motive and purpose may seem similar, but in reality they are very different from each other. A motive is what is the initial reason for performing an action, while a goal is the final result towards which the person performing the action moves. It is goals that can determine whether actions are good or bad. For example, this can be done by looking at whether the interests of the person performing the action coincide with the interests of the people around him. If interests coincide, then the action may be good, but if this does not happen, then the action will definitely be bad and selfish. Naturally, there is no categoricalness here, so interests often partially coincide. Accordingly, there are not only good and bad deeds, but in any case every person knows this.

Action and its role in personality development. Human character and life circumstances.

A number of psychologists understand by action

an action that expresses a person’s attitude towards other people, the task at hand, existing social norms, values and therefore, as a rule, subject to public assessment. So, S.L. Rubinstein calls an action an action in which a person’s position, a conscious attitude towards other people, towards the norms of public morality is expressed. Aseev V.G. indicates that an act is always an action evaluated in a broad social context, an action that has a certain social meaning. Petrovsky A.V. O.

Thus, psychologists are currently introducing the concept of “ action

" to indicate:

– conscious actions in which a person expresses his attitude towards other people and the world as a whole and having social significance;

– moral actions, i.e. actions aimed at the creative embodiment of existing values in individual activities, achieving moral ideals, observing moral imperatives, etc.;

– activities in which a person expresses his moral attitude towards the world;

– special personal activity of a person, not reducible to the implementation of individual actions or activities.

It is necessary to distinguish between the concepts of “activity”, “behavior” and “action”. Deed

- this is an action (an element of activity) with a clear social meaning.
An act
is a conscious action of a person who understands its social meaning and is performed in accordance with the accepted intention;

Personality begins with action. A person’s choice of action is, as a rule, conscious. This choice is focused on achieving a personally significant result, which determines the direction of the action. Thus, personality expresses itself in action, and action expresses personality.

Attention!

If you need help writing a paper, we recommend turning to professionals. More than 70,000 authors are ready to help you right now. Free adjustments and improvements. Find out the cost of your work.

Cost calculationGuaranteesReviews

Expression (self-expression) is associated with the structure of the action. The structure of an act concentrates the components of individual moral consciousness, which is realized in the behavior of the individual. It is possible that the mechanism of transition from internal to external is carried out with the help of a semantic attitude, which is formed on the basis of personal meaning. In this case, the semantic attitude ensures the stability of the act and behavior as a whole and serves as a connecting link between the internal content side of the act and its external formal manifestation.

The action underlies the assessment of the individual by others. A moral assessment of an action is possible and necessary only when the actor has freedom to choose both the goal and the means of achieving it. Without analyzing the structure, it is impossible to give a moral assessment of this or that action. Analysis of the student’s actions is of paramount importance for the teacher, because it determines the nature of the assessment of the individual as a whole and the choice of methods for his upbringing. What is an action?

The most general definition of an act convinces us that an act is a personally significant act, controlled by a system of norms accepted in society. According to established ethical ideas, an act is a kind of “cell” of moral behavior. Every action is a holistic phenomenon in which subjective-personal (motives) and objectively significant (results) elements coexist. An action with equal justification can be understood as a subjectively motivated result and as an objectively realized motive. An act is performed out of good will, out of internal motivation: its motive is duty, conscience and other strictly moral norms of motivation. The result of an action is always moral. An act devoid of moral result is called an offense.

Misdeeds go beyond the requirements of normative morality that underlie behavior.

The action has a certain orientation towards other people. A single act verifies a line of behavior and contributes to the individual’s choice of decision - to accept it or reject it. In an act, individual (individual), special (group, collective) and general (social) moral experience interpenetrate each other. “Therefore, moral actions express a variety of social relationships: individuals and individuals, individuals and groups, individuals and collectives, individuals and society.

It is noteworthy that an act can manifest itself not only in action, but also in evasion from it. But that's not the point. An action reflects a subjective value attitude, without which it simply does not exist. Moreover, the act lies both in the sphere of objective and in the sphere of subjective. The value of an action is determined by a morally valuable motive embodied in a personally and socially significant result; moreover, the moral value of an action lies in the harmony of motive and result. It is equally important that the value of an action is determined through the relationship between goals and means.

Finally, let us pay attention to the relationship between action and choice. Moral choice is usually spoken of as a choice of values and as a choice of action.

Actualization of choice requires preference for one of the options for action. An act is the core of moral choice, in which internal incentives merge with the process of realizing moral values. The conclusion about the isomorphism (correspondence) of the structure of moral choice to the structure of action is also very significant. In other words, by identifying and analyzing the structure of an act, we identify and analyze the structure of choice, and vice versa.

Character

is a set of stable individual properties of a person that determine his typical modes of behavior and activity.

The main condition for the formation and development of character

is the social environment. Of course, physiological conditions cannot be discounted. After all, the peculiarities of the functioning of the brain (processes of excitation, inhibition, the degree of mobility of nervous processes) largely determine the differences in mental reactions to the same influences.

Every person from the first days of his life is included in the system of objective attitudes of the people around him to reality. He turns out to be included in the system of relations of these people to each other and to himself. Gradually, all these relationships become his own relationships - to nature, social institutions, work, public and personal property, to other people, to himself.

Personal attitudes towards various aspects of reality, which become typical for a person and are manifested in the modes of behavior that have become habitual for him, constitute the character of this person. In other words, relatively stable and typical personal relationships to reality, manifested in the usual ways of behavior for a person, which are usually attributed to the sphere of character, are always in the closest relationships with each other and together form a more or less complex structure.

Every person, from childhood, develops a system of values in which different aspects of reality related to nature, human communities, the affairs of the person himself, etc., have unequal subjective significance for him, since they serve in different ways to satisfy his material and spiritual needs. That is why a person behaves differently when faced with different aspects of reality. For example, realizing that there is a very significant event in front of him, a person gives a strong emotional response and behaves accordingly. In another case, faced with an event that he evaluates as insignificant, a person gives a weak emotional reaction to it and again behaves accordingly. Thus, the relationship essentially represents a unity, a kind of “fusion”, of knowledge, experience and behavior.

People's attitudes to individual aspects of reality, their components and characteristics, as a rule, differ from each other not only by varying degrees of positivity or negativity, but also by varying degrees of generalization and differentiation. For example, one person can treat things that constitute public and personal property with equal thrift; for another, this quality manifests itself only in relation to personal objects. Or a person may consistently behave as a collectivist within the work team of which he is a member, but lose this quality outside of it. And his teammate shows this quality equally in the brigade and in any other community, both in official and unofficial settings.

Thus, in specific cases, a person’s attitude acts as a kind of integration of more particular, so to speak, partial relations to various objects, situations, events, states of the reality surrounding him, etc., which he combines according to some characteristics into one category. The system of such more general relationships constitutes the structure of a person’s character.

We have already discussed above that behind a person’s relationships there are always his needs, and to be more precise, a person’s needs are manifested in relationships. Therefore, it is clear that the uniqueness of the system of relationships that form character, and therefore its structure, largely depends on what needs a person has, which of them are expressed more strongly, which are weaker, how far they are separated from each other in content. Thus, if the leading human need is the need to work “not for fear, but for conscience,” then we have one system of relationships and a completely definite structure of character. On the contrary, if a person’s need to work is completely undeveloped, and among other needs the desire to parasitize and spend time idly dominates, then we have a completely different system of relationships, and the character has a structure that is different in content and form.

You should pay attention to one more character parameter that usually catches your eye when comparing the personalities of different people - strength of character. When in a person’s system of needs one or several closely related needs subjugate his thoughts and feelings for a long time, then their owner is constantly encouraged to overcome external and internal obstacles that prevent the satisfaction of the dominant need (or group of needs). This means that his character, in terms of strength, is becoming increasingly pronounced.

Numerous facts obtained in specially conducted experimental studies, as well as through observations of people’s behavior in everyday life, show that there is not always a direct correspondence between the content of character and its form. For example, several people, based on the content of the leading relationships in their characters, may turn out to be collectivists. However, the form of expression of their collectivistic character varies greatly. For some, collectivism in its form is not loud, not flashy, but is clearly expressed in behavior aimed at benefiting the country, people, comrades in a common cause, and manifests itself in caring for loved ones. For others - leaders by nature - collectivism is associated with a bright emotional manner of expression and increased activity.

In everyday life, we also encounter people’s characters where the form (behavior) can sharply disharmonize with the content. For example, a person behaves like a collectivist in front of others, but he does not experience a dominant (among others) need to be a collectivist. Those around them, without penetrating into the personality of such a person, as a rule, are not able to immediately understand that the imitation of collectivism they observe is a manifestation of another need he has, say, self-affirmation.

Many psychologists call will the spine of character. And there are reasons for this. No wonder wisdom says: sow an action and you will reap a habit, sow a habit and you will reap a character, sow a character and you will reap a destiny. Actions are the clearest manifestation of will. And if we repeat them repeatedly, trying to ensure that they meet the standards of high morality, they form volitional qualities that correspond to it, becoming character traits.

Thus, in the early stages of a person’s life, the facets of character

“hones” mainly life itself. Gradually, the initiative increasingly passes into the hands of the individual himself.

We will help you write any paper on a similar topic.

Essay
Action and its role in personality development. Human character and life circumstances.
From 250 rub.
Test
Action and its role in personality development. Human character and life circumstances.
From 250 rub.
Course work
Action and its role in personality development. Human character and life circumstances.
From 700 rub.

Receive completed work or specialist advice on your educational project
Find out the cost

Facilities

Vice and driving force

The opposite of virtue is vice. It shapes a person’s actions, directing them towards evil. In order to establish himself in virtue, a person must acquire knowledge and acquire prudence. Socrates did not deny the presence of pleasures in human life. But he denied their decisive power over him. The basis of bad actions is ignorance, and the basis of moral actions is knowledge. In his research, he analyzed a lot of human action: what is its driving force, motive, impulse. The thinker comes close to the Christian views formed later. We can say that he deeply penetrated into the human essence of man, into the concept of the essence of freedom of choice, knowledge, prudence and the origin of vice.

Process

There is no point in talking a lot about the process, that is, directly performing the act itself, but it cannot be ignored. Moreover, the process of committing an act can vary greatly. For example, the actions of children usually have a fairly simple and uncomplicated process, but with age it gradually becomes more complex, including preliminary thinking, planning, options for the development of events, and so on. However, as in all cases, it all comes down to taking the action and getting the result.

Result

Since we are talking about the result of an action, we need to dwell on this concept and analyze it in a little more detail. As with ordinary action, in most cases, after completing the process of action, a certain result will be visible. However, actions and deeds differ from each other in that the action includes consciousness. Accordingly, as already mentioned in the paragraph describing the subject of transformation, the result is not only what happened as a result of completing the process of the act, but also personal changes in the person performing it, in another person, as well as interpersonal changes. Simply put, taking an action only gives the actual result. While committing an act also carries with it moral consequences.

"Socratic Dialogue"

Socrates departs from the earthly. He rises higher in considering such a concept as an act. What is it, what is its essence? This is what the thinker wants to understand. He seeks the meaning of all human existence, starting from the physical and selfish. Thus, a complex system of techniques is developed, which is called “Socratic dialogue”. These methods lead a person along the path of knowledge of the truth. The philosopher leads the interlocutor to understand the deep meaning of masculinity, goodness, valor, moderation, virtue. Without such qualities, an individual cannot consider himself a human being. Virtue is the developed habit of always striving for good, which will form the corresponding good deeds.

Grade

Well, the last point that is worth talking about is the assessment of the action. This is the highest level of human consciousness when performing an action. As mentioned earlier, an action can be reflexive, instinctive and, finally, conscious. The latter includes the understanding that there will be some result in the end, as well as movement towards a certain goal. But there is an even higher level - the assessment of the action, that is, the analysis of what happened, what factors were involved, what consequences emerged, and how it affected people and the environment as a whole. However, in order to fully evaluate an action, you need to know all its components, starting with the motive and ending with the final result. Only then will you be able to evaluate the action objectively and draw appropriate conclusions regarding it.

Well, now you know what an act is, how it differs from an ordinary action, what its types are, what its features and components are, how good actions differ from bad ones, and so on. This information is not vital, you can easily exist without it, but still it may turn out to be useful, informative and more than interesting for you.

Measure of actions

He introduces the concept of the measure of actions: lack, excess and what is between them. It is by acting according to the patterns of the middle management, the philosopher believes, that a person makes the right choice. An example of such a measure is masculinity, which falls between such qualities as reckless courage and cowardice. He also divides actions into voluntary, when the source lies within the person himself, and involuntary, forced by external circumstances. Considering the action, the essence of the concept, the corresponding role in the life of a person and society, we draw some conclusions. We can say that to a certain extent both philosophers are right. They looked at the inner man quite deeply, avoiding superficial judgments and searching for the truth.