Constructive and destructive criticism: what it is, rules, algorithms, examples

Each person behaves differently when he is criticized, some calmly listen, listen to comments and try to improve, others, on the contrary, show aggression towards the critic, get offended, give up and withdraw into themselves. In this article I will talk about constructive and destructive criticism, explain what it is, and give some examples. In life we ​​are often criticized, in childhood by our parents, at school by teachers, at university by professors, at work by our boss. Often even the most insignificant reproach makes us angry, resentful or sad.

Constructive criticism: what does it mean?

This is expressing your personal opinion with the goal of helping a person. The interlocutor evaluates your work or action and makes clear comments that are aimed at improving your activities. Such a discussion can be objective, that is, it can be an analysis or a form of useful recommendations or advice.

The main signs of constructive comments.

• Objectivity. When a person expresses his opinion, he does not pretend to be true, but emphasizes that this is only his personal position.
• Accuracy. The critic pays attention to specific elements of the work that seem unclear or questionable to him.
• Reasoning. The person who criticizes explains his point of view and gives arguments.
• Awareness. The critic must be well versed in the topic of discussion. He may have professional training or experience.
• Respect. The person making the remark should not become personal and impose his point of view. It is necessary to treat your opponent with respect.
• Sincerity. The critic points out not only the disadvantages, but also the advantages of your activities.

This type of discussion allows us to see our weaknesses in order to quickly correct them and achieve an ideal state of work.

Methods of psychological protection

Psychological protection - these are the mechanisms of the psyche, which seem to protect the individual’s awareness of various kinds of negative emotional experiences and perceptions, contribute to the preservation of psychological homeostasis, stability, resolution of intrapersonal conflicts and occur at the unconscious and subconscious psychological levels.

In the ordinary life of any person, certain emotionally intense and negative situations arise, the experience of which leads to various kinds of personal disorders, troubles, negative affects, and destruction. When a person’s desires, interests, and needs cannot be satisfied, despite significant efforts, states of emotional tension arise—stress and frustration. Often all constructive attempts made do not lead to the desired goal.

The tension continues to grow and the person ceases to notice alternative paths. In addition, an increase in tension is often accompanied by emotional arousal, which interferes with rational choice processes: a person becomes worried, panics, loses control of himself, and various destructive consequences appear. In many cases, stress relief occurs with the help of psychological defenses.

Examples of defensive behaviors include:

— aggression (or attack on the “frustrator”);

— autism (self-isolation, “escape from the frustrator”);

— repression (suppression of desires, “rejection of the frustrator”);

— rationalization (explaining behavior with false motives, “justifying the frustrator”);

— sublimation (switching behavior from an unsuccessful activity to a new one, “replacing a frustrator”)

- forgetting;

- self-forgiveness (“Yes! What?”);

- projection of one’s own guilt onto everyone else (“It’s your own fault!”), etc.

Scheme of personality “action” with the participation of psychological defenses

As we noted above, the term “psychological defense” was first introduced into psychology by the famous Austrian psychologist Sigmund Freud.

The concept of psychological defense mechanisms is more fully presented by A. Freud, in particular in her work “Psychology of the Self and Defense Mechanisms,” the Russian version of which was published in 1993. Considering psychological defenses as one of the mechanisms of adaptation and integration of the personality, she believed that they are unconscious, acquired in the process of personality development, ways for the ego to achieve a compromise between the opposing forces of the id or super-ego and external reality. Psychological defense mechanisms are aimed at reducing anxiety caused by intrapsychic conflict.

A. Freud (following her father S. Freud) believed that the defense mechanism is based on two types of reactions:

Protection is not a personality structure “built-in” from birth. In the process of socialization, protective mechanisms arise, change, and are rebuilt under the influence of social influences. For example, protection can turn into altruism or accumulation of values, etc. Ultimately, psychological defenses become a way of existing for unrealized drives, desires, and needs.

Psychological security is a property of a mature personality, which depends on intelligence, attentiveness, a penchant for analysis, critical thinking and emotional stability. There are several practice-tested psychological defense techniques.

Getting stung by one or even several bees can be good for your health. But if you are attacked by a swarm of wasps or find yourself the victim of a poisonous snake bite, then you will be in trouble. Your competitors, ill-wishers or enemies are capable of causing you no less harm simply by using words that hurt your soul as a psychological weapon. And the longer you worry about this, the more likely you are to end up among the losers.

“If a person shows that he is irritated and is not able to control his emotions, he needs to do something other than work with people,” confidently stated the Frenchman Michel Fadoul, who has achieved brilliant success in business at the world level.

Ask yourself and others more often magical questions: what, where, when, how, why and why? Try to imagine the entire panorama and dynamics of the event, see the whole picture and note contradictions, inconsistencies and blind spots, pay careful attention to the details. They are the necessary material for assessing the reliability of information. We offer you several psychological defense techniques developed by us and tested in our trainings.

Reception "Fan" . Analyze what you react to most painfully. What irritates you? What makes you mad or sad? Remember the specific words, intonations, gestures of your opponents or offenders. Close your eyes and remember again all the most offensive, biting, burning words that make you feel confused and worthless or cause powerful outbursts of aggression.

Now imagine that you are sitting opposite the person who is inflicting these psychological blows on you. He is the one who says cruel, hurtful words to you. And you feel yourself starting to get turned on. Create a feeling of impact within yourself. What part of your body reacts to it? What happens: does heat appear throughout the body, or is something shrinking inside, or maybe breathing is simply interrupted? What exactly is happening to you? Use the emotion ventilation technique. Imagine that between you and the offender there is a powerful fan, which immediately takes his words to the side, their sharp arrows do not reach you.

Open your eyes, and you will probably feel that you are now able to withstand such a psychological blow.

Reception "Aquarium" . If, when communicating with people who are negatively disposed towards you, you continue to react painfully to their attacks, use this technique. Imagine that between you and your offender there is a thick glass wall of an aquarium. He says something unpleasant to you, but you only see him and don’t hear the words, they are absorbed by the water and only bubble with foam on the surface. That's why they don't affect you. And you, without losing your composure and peace of mind, do not succumb to provocation, do not react to offensive words. And thanks to this, you turn the situation in your favor.

Disneyland reception . The painfulness of a psychological blow can be softened, or even completely eliminated, if you treat all people like little children. You don't take offense at stupid children, do you?

Imagine that you find yourself alone against a whole group of people who are negatively disposed towards you. The preponderance of forces is on their side. And you have only one chance to turn the tide: imagine them as a group of children on the playground. They get angry, act up, scream, wave their arms, throw toys on the floor, and trample them underfoot. In general, they try in every possible way to piss you off. But you, as an adult, wise person, treat their antics as childish pranks and continue to remain calm until they fizzle out.

You do not perceive their words as insults, you do not react to their attacks. It’s funny for you to watch all this as an adult... The “Fox and the Grapes” technique. If there have been cases in your past when someone managed to annoy you so much that the experience of defeat remains to this day, use the technique of rationalization, removing negative “anchors.” Remember the fable “The Fox and the Grapes”: not reaching the bunch of grapes, the fox said that she didn’t really want grapes - they were sour and green.

Reception "Ocean of Calm" . Imagine yourself as the main character of the parable: “The ocean receives the waters of many stormy rivers, but at the same time remains motionless. The one into whom all thoughts and emotions flow in the same way remains dispassionate in peace.”

Reception "Theater of the Absurd" . You can use such a psychological defense technique as bringing the situation to the point of absurdity. This is basically the same as making a molehill out of a molehill. That is, to hyperbolize out loud beyond recognition what someone is only hinting at, and thus unexpectedly knock psychological weapons out of the hands of one’s enemies or ill-wishers. Your goal is to make sure that any attacks from an ill-wisher no longer cause anything but laughter. This is the solution to the problem of how to protect yourself from psychological attack.

Reception "Puppet Theater" . If you find it difficult to communicate with people who are emotionally significant to you, use this technique. Imagine that they are just caricatured characters from the TV show “Dolls”. And let them say nonsense when communicating with each other. And you just watch it from the outside and make your own assessments. Play this show until you laugh. Your laughter is an indication that the technique worked.

In addition to psychological methods of reducing one’s own psycho-emotional stress, there are methods of protection (rules of behavior) that help create a favorable socio-psychological environment during the discussion.

Let us highlight the most important rules of conduct:

The interlocutor is not always right, but often it is beneficial for us to admit that he is right, especially in small things.

Big moves are usually beneficial. They open up new opportunities, due to which the advantage lost for a while is quickly restored.

To a certain extent, comments and objections can be considered a natural phenomenon in any conversation, but in no case should you feel like an accused person who must, of course, defend himself.

In order to make it easier to understand the position of our interlocutor and his reaction, we need to try to look at the comments and at the interlocutor subjectively - from his point of view. The objective reason for comments can often be some small thing. At the moment of making a comment, the interlocutor rarely remains calm; as a rule, expecting our reaction, he becomes sensitive to any sign of distrust and defiant behavior. The conclusion suggests itself: in such situations, we must fully think through and control our behavior so as not to add fuel to the fire.

Remarks that are caused by the “inferiority complex” experienced by our interlocutor require special attention and great caution, since if he is insulted as a person, the matter can reach a scandal and the conversation can descend to the level of an ordinary quarrel.

It should be borne in mind that comments and observations do not always have to relate to the material as a whole, which is the subject of the conversation, but rather may relate to its appropriateness, choice and method of presentation.

There is no need to draw conclusions about the insincerity of our interlocutor until it is actually proven that he is not telling the truth. At the same time, it is better to try to justify the interlocutor than to immediately condemn him. He may be wrong in some ways, but despite this, you can trust him, which, of course, will greatly facilitate the achievement of mutual understanding in a business conversation.

If we go along with questionable comments and objections, this will certainly not mean that we take the blame upon ourselves or that these comments oblige us to anything in the future.

You can put your interlocutor in a good mood by making some concessions. But you need to know exactly the size of the concessions before deciding on them. Often the concession is actually less than it seems to us at first glance.

Any disagreement with a remark must be fully explained to the interlocutor (it must also be motivated from a psychological point of view), since a correct refutation of a remark can often increase our chances of success in a business conversation. We should refrain from clashes in conversation, as this can actually call into question the correctness of our relationship with the interlocutor.

When your interlocutor reacts emotionally, you should remember that you can hardly have a business-like conversation with an excited and agitated person. The interlocutor should always feel that we take his comment seriously and that we have carefully considered it before giving a final answer. In addition, it is advisable to express to him your thoughts about the remark and intermediate assessments, the linking of which leads to neutralization of the remark.

At the same time, of course, one should not rush to the other extreme - excessively delay explanations. You should make it easier for your interlocutor to express comments and objections, and try to detect his unspoken displeasure and excitement. Replying to clear and reasonable comments does not require special tactics or special interpretation. In such cases, if possible, we should, as soon as possible and with a sense of full responsibility and attention, sort out the mistakes due to which the interlocutor avoids us and leaves us without attention.

This is, in short, “bon ton” - the rules of good manners that should be followed when the interlocutor begins to make comments to us during a business conversation. These rules should not be adhered to too strictly, since they also develop and adapt to the practice and current norms of business conduct and, of course, to our personality and the personality of the interlocutor.

Psychologists also recommend resorting to various methods of ethical protection. Ethical protection is the actions of an individual carried out in order to protect against attacks on his dignity.

Now let's give an example from real life. The young lady says: “I was wearing a striped fur coat. The man behind said, “Do the tigers get off at the next stop?” I replied: “No, they let donkeys through!” I used to think that I handled the defense well and put the gentleman in his place. And now I see that I have descended to his level, without in any way initiating his subjectivity, and therefore, without performing any of the named functions. I suppressed the subject without changing him in any way.” We will present here several methods of ethical protection (some of which we will illustrate with examples), the further use of which is useful in any area of ​​​​relationships.

Soft methods of protection:

1. Question for reproduction - to suspend the communication that has begun at a low level, belittling a person’s dignity. Please reproduce the words that allegedly turned out to be incomprehensible. Paradigms are used: “Sorry, I didn’t understand...?”, “I didn’t hear, could you repeat it?”, “What did you say?” Usually, the offender is not able to communicate at the level of his choice after such questions.

2. Question about the addressee - naive misunderstanding is instrumentalized. The impossibility of the form of communication proposed by the partner is declared. "Are you talking to me?" (facial expressions of bewilderment; plasticity of searching for who such an address is addressed to, but without ridicule, mockery, arrogance).

3. Cultural reproduction—produced for the purpose of correcting behavior. The point is to show your partner a different form of communication (cultural). Paradigm: “If I understand you correctly...”, and what the partner said is added, but in an ethical form (helps to bring it to a higher level of communication).

4. Reference to personal characteristics - a declaration, recognition of any personal qualities that do not allow a person to communicate at a given level: “I’m not used to this...”, “I’m always embarrassed...”, “I’m built in such a way that I can’t.” . The subject seems to regret that he cannot maintain communication at a given level, but this regret is firm and unwavering.

5. Justifying behavior is a way of elevating a partner, recognizing his merits. “You probably wanted...”, “You probably thought...”. The partner seems to see his good possibilities in the mirror. The offender unwittingly agrees with positive suggestions, and the level of communication rises higher.

In our example with the “tigers” and “donkeys,” this method could be the most effective, although it would look less impressive: “Perhaps you wanted to ask if I would let you (get off) at the next stop?” But you would raise your opponent to another level of communication and at the same time preserve his and your own dignity.

6. Showing kindness is a way of cheerfully ignoring what happened. Concentrating on detail. “It’s so good that you reminded me...”, “If it weren’t for you, I would have forgotten or not noticed...”, “Thank you for saying”, “How attentive you are to me...”

Now rehearse yourself, choosing the optimal method of soft defense in conditional situations.

Hard forms of protection

Strict forms of protection can only be used in relationships with adults. They are rarely used because they cause communication to be temporarily interrupted.

1. Generous forgiveness - visible resignation to the rudeness of a partner who cannot yet behave differently. “If you want it so much...”, “If this is the only way you can do it...”, “If it brings you a feeling of satisfaction...”. This is a strong impact that does not imply further communication or clarification of the relationship.

2. Comparison of the partner’s merits with his behavior - the hidden mechanism of influence of this form of protection lies in the elevation of the partner. The partner doesn’t want to fall from this height; he has something to lose. The paradigm of this method: “You are so ... (smart, decent) ah, ...". The last part of the phrase is unsaid, the offender completes it, thinks it out himself.

3. Leaving you alone is a tough and laconic method. Breaking relationships “here and now.” Responsibility for what was done is shifted to the partner. The paradigms used are: “You are probably not able to understand what you said,” “It’s a pity that you don’t realize what just happened,” “You don’t understand what you did.”

When using methods of ethical protection, it is important to ensure that you do not resort to moralizing and open assessment. It should be remembered that psychologists recommend using methods of ethical protection primarily in pre-conflict situations.

Destructive criticism

This is an indication of the opponent’s shortcomings for selfish purposes. Such a critic has no desire to help; he does it to offend the person.

The main reasons for such unfounded reproaches.

• Manipulation. Manipulative influence on a person is aimed at persuading him to take actions beneficial to the critic.
• Envy. Even if it is a flawless job, envious people will still find flaws and point them out, even if it is not true.
• Non-standard. If any opponent does everything differently from others, there will be a large number of people who want to unreasonably criticize him.
• Bias. The critic is completely confident in the truthfulness of his thoughts and does not give the opportunity to refute them.

The Importance of Mindfulness

To make it clearer what constructive criticism is, I want to give real-life examples that will show the difference between devaluation and the desire to promote. After all, in fact, we need it in order to make someone better or solve some problem. Let's say you are an excellent swimmer in different styles and decide to teach your son. So, by pointing out his mistakes, you are striving for him to realize what he is doing wrong and correct himself, becoming an excellent swimmer?

If you were destructive, you would simply raise your self-esteem at his expense, reminding you every time that you swim much cooler. Or they would complain about how long it took to study, how scary, difficult and painful it was, wanting to gain recognition in such a clumsy way. They would let off steam, shouting at every failure that he was mediocre and that even small children better understand what needs to be done. In general, be sure to ask yourself before the dialogue, what exactly do you want to get from your comments? Why do you need this?

If you really just want to relax or get “imaginary respect”, you shouldn’t start a conversation, try to look for other ways to satisfy your needs. A person on a subconscious level feels the sincerity of impulses, so be careful not to cause harm or provoke a conflict.

The main differences between these two varieties

Constructive judgments contribute to self-development, while destructive ones destroy aspirations and cause mental wounds. The main feature of valid criticism is the provision of valuable advice for correcting mistakes and improving performance.

Negative reproaches are based on insults and aggression; such appraisers are not responsible for their words, which hurt and reduce self-esteem. If you encounter such an individual, try to avoid communicating with him, this way you will maintain your calm and your confidence will not suffer.

Actions that do not relate to objective judgment:

• Intimidation. Not allowed: “If you don’t clean your room, you’ll go hungry.” Allowed: “Clean up the house, while I prepare dinner.”
• Insults. You can’t: “You look very bad, haven’t you washed your hair again?” In general, one should not evaluate external data.
• Subjectivity. Don't criticize your friend for her taste, dreams and goals.

Necessity

Here we are talking about professional relationships. When you are a leader, teacher or educator, criticism is an integral part of your relationship. To begin with, remember that you should always start with praise, positive assessment and analysis of what was done correctly. This will allow your interlocutor to gain self-confidence and set a positive tone for the further conversation.

Next, you analyze violations, errors and blunders. Never equate a person's mistake with his personality traits. You have no right to criticize a person; your task is to analyze his actions.

And at the end of the conversation, return to the person’s praise and positive aspects.

Focus on the benefits. This type of conversation technique will help you not kill a person’s motivation and will not lower his self-esteem

Listen carefully to the person. To give a fair assessment, you definitely need to understand the whole matter. Often we overlook details that ultimately turn out to be fundamental. My article “Selective Hearing” will help you.

If you see your mistake, then immediately admit it. Let's look at an example: a boss sets a task for an employee. He explains the essence of the task and indicates the deadlines. The employee, being responsible, completes everything on time, but it turns out that during this time the numbers have already changed and the final result turns out to be irrelevant.

In this situation, the boss can act in two ways. The first is to scold the employee for inattention, lack of intelligence, and so on. The second is to admit your mistake in providing false data and help the employee understand how to avoid a similar mistake in the future.

In addition, it should be remembered that it is better to point out errors privately, rather than publicly. It is always worth remembering the individual characteristics of the person being criticized and you should never mention past mistakes, because now you are considering a specific situation.

Why are we so sensitive to criticism?

Many studies have concluded that praise has a positive effect on the result, but various types of comments have a negative effect. We react to reproaches more sharply and remember them faster than compliments. One of the reasons for this phenomenon is evolution. During the evolutionary period, we learned to quickly respond to negative stimuli. In the wild, such signals portend mortal danger, so it is necessary to respond sharply to them in order to survive. Now everything has changed, but we react to troubles in the same way - emotionally and strongly.

Psychologist Daria Milai

Make an appointment

The next reason why we are overwhelmed with emotions when someone criticizes us is a new experience. We have a negative attitude towards stimuli that are unusual for us.

The benefits of objective comments

Reasonable assessment is the most important tool with which we become better, and it also allows us to work on our mistakes. Constructive comments should prevail in professional activities; they are important for relationships with partners, colleagues, as well as with friends and relatives. Without the ability to talk about what you don't like, you will not build strong family, friendship, or team bonds.

Being comfortable with our judgments helps us to be more courageous in making smart decisions, and it also makes us realize that for everyone, neither we nor our work will ever be perfect, and there will always be things that need to be improved, no matter how small. Outside comments identify our weaknesses and give us the opportunity to correct our work so that it becomes even better. It is important to hear the assessment and identify shortcomings that can be corrected, rather than accepting the false conclusion that everything is perfect.

Such a thesis as constructive criticism is one of the important tools for the formation of society and the development of human relations. When we are discussed, it means that we represent something.

FAQ

The following are answers to questions frequently asked by people interested in the topic of criticism.

Who shouldn't be criticized?

You shouldn't criticize people who work hard. Also, you should not criticize people who have achieved success in something. We also urge readers to refrain from making critical judgments about vulnerable and sensitive people. In the first case, first of all, it is worth thinking about why a person devotes himself to work. It is likely that he has reasons: lack of money, an attempt to forget himself, sincere passion for his work. In the second case, criticism will only talk about envy. Instead of criticizing successful people, you should try to achieve something on your own, to conquer some heights. The third is about a situation when a person needs more support, help, but not assessments. They can drive it deeper into themselves and sharpen sensitivity.

Who can you criticize?

A striking example of the appropriateness of judgments is the comments of real professionals. If, say, a manager gives you advice at work, does it softly and tactfully notes what learning them can bring, you should listen. Another example to understand is advice from a friend, significant other, or other person that is not based on something negative. Try to distinguish well-wishers from ill-wishers. This will make it easier to “filter” criticism.

Why is criticism dangerous?

The danger of criticism comes down to the fact that as a result, the likelihood of offending the person subjected to value judgments becomes quite high. If we are talking about strong friendships or warm connections, they can spoil the relationship. Especially if they are subjective. We recommend that you refer to the section “Rules for using criticism”. Knowing them will allow you not only not to offend people, but also to separate valuable advice from subjective judgments on the part of others.

Where does the habit of criticizing come from?

Psychologists note that often the habit of criticizing is a psychological defense. This instrument is developed by people who have previously been subjected to unfounded value judgments, who have suffered from this, and even experienced depression. For them, criticism is a tool for preventing attacks and critical statements from others.

What are people called who criticize everything?

These are critics. If a critic is also a perfectionist, things are bad. Often this combination leads to people becoming toxic and starting to look for something bad, flaws, cons in everything and everyone.

When is criticism appropriate?

It’s worth expressing your opinion about a person’s work or actions if you want to help him and not to insult or offend him. If a person posts the result of his activities online or presents them to colleagues, he should prepare for comments in advance, listen to them carefully and thank them for the help provided. When evaluating any subject or activity, a critic needs to determine whether he is the target audience and whether he has the right to evaluate this work, since there is a possibility that the shortcomings he identifies will be insignificant and will not affect anything.

Face-to-face consultation

What are the features and advantages of face-to-face consultation?

Find out more

Skype consultation

What are the features and benefits of Skype consultations?

Find out more

Criticism is allowed to those people who will subsequently interact with the opponent and deal with his unfinished mistakes.

The main feature of all judgments is the relevance of the opinion and the understanding that it will benefit the person being criticized and will not offend him. This behavior should be followed when commenting on a person’s appearance. It’s stupid to assume that she will immediately make an appointment with a stylist just because she was told about it. Criticism should be where without it complete failure can occur.

Taking into account the psychological characteristics of partners in evaluative statements

Criticism only becomes useful when people accept it.

This rule can be reduced to the following settings:

— Criticism addressed to me is my personal reserve for improvement.

— Criticism is a form of help to eliminate shortcomings in work.

— There is no criticism from which one could not derive benefit.

— Any retouching of criticism is harmful, since it “drives the disease inside” and thereby makes it difficult to overcome shortcomings.

— The business perception of criticism should not depend on who (which person, for what purposes) makes critical remarks.

— The perception of criticism should not depend on the form in which it is presented: the main thing is that the shortcomings are analyzed.

— The central principle of constructive perception of criticism is “everything I have done can be done better.”

— The most valuable benefit of external criticism is to find a rational grain for yourself, even where it is not visible at first glance.

— Any criticism requires at least thinking about what caused it, and at most, how to correct the situation.

— A useful way to deal with criticism is to see areas of work that are outside your field of vision.

— The first step in correctly perceiving criticism is fixing it, the second is understanding from the point of view of its benefits to the cause, the third is correcting the shortcoming, the fourth is creating conditions that prevent its repetition.

— If they criticize me, it means they believe in my ability to fix things and work without failures.

— When there is no criticism addressed to you, this is an indicator of disdain for you as an employee or lack of faith in your ability to perceive it in a businesslike manner.

— The most valuable criticism is that which points out the imperfection of what seems normal.

— Criticism of the possible negative consequences of the decisions I have made is a prerequisite for the timely prevention of work failures.

— The person being criticized has no right to be offended; he only has the right to constructively comprehend what is said to him.

— The person being criticized has the right to counter-criticism. He can actively defend his position. The only thing he is strictly forbidden to do is distort facts for the sake of justification.

— A large number of biased (unfair) criticisms are an indicator of a poor psychological climate in the team. This in itself requires active critical reflection.

“If I reacted to a critical remark with restraint and in a businesslike manner, it means I have overcome myself, I am a strong person.”

- Any criticism is useful if only because it allows you to find out the attitude of the critic towards you, which could be expressed in more extreme forms.

“People are most impressed by a response to criticism that contains specific commitments about what will be done to improve things, with a specific time frame and realistic possibilities.”

— Acknowledging criticism means accepting responsibility for correcting shortcomings.

- Even if the critic is mistaken, one should not rush to rebuke him: in order to involve others in the sphere of criticism, it is useful to support his attempt to critically understand the matter.

All participants in the discussion of any problem have the same rights and are equally subject to these rules.

What makes a judgment constructive?

First of all, it is a respectful and correctly noted comment about the opponent’s work or actions. Such a review does not imply a hidden meaning and further personalization, a surge of negativity for self-affirmation at the expense of another individual, and this statement should not offend him or hurt his self-esteem. All of the above components do not apply to constructive criticism.

When assessing, attention is paid not to condemnation, demonstration of superiority and ridicule, but to real help, which will subsequently allow a person to achieve perfection.

You need to criticize where this action is appropriate. If you are sure that the interlocutor will adequately respond to your comments, act, but if you notice any barrier and feel aggression directed in your direction, stop, as your opponent will not support the conversation with you .

Before expressing your point of view and pointing out shortcomings, start your dialogue with praise, describe all the advantages of the work that attracted you, ask open questions, discuss. Also, think through your arguments carefully, speak clearly and on topic, and respect your colleague.

Mixed type

It is worth emphasizing that there is also mixed criticism - it combines both constructive and destructive. As a rule, it contains really useful argumentation, expressed in a softer or more crude form, but supported by some kind of misinformation. Mixed criticism is most common in everyday life. Basically, these are not detailed official reviews, but simple, philistine ones.

Rospotrebnadzor banned the use of smartphones in education

COVID is spreading more slowly in Russia due to the development of herd immunity

Events from childhood that helped Sergei Bodrov grow up to be a good person

What notes should you not pay attention to?

We often express our opinion, we do it involuntarily, we do not strive to ensure that our point of view is objective. Sometimes we don’t want to help someone at all, we simply talk about our thoughts, tastes, experiences or hobbies, and we can also throw out a flurry of negative emotions on a colleague.

Nowadays we are very susceptible to criticism, we face it everywhere.

• Internet. On social networks, people leave comments to each other, some are positive, others are aggressive. You shouldn't take them seriously.
• Policy. Our television screens often broadcast debates between political figures, who, despite their status, subsequently turn to shouting and sometimes to personalities.
• The science. A community of scientists can become divided over differing opinions on one specific issue.

Don't pay attention to judgments that are intended to hurt or offend you. They are untrue and unfounded. In any group of people you will find a like-minded person who will support you and give valuable advice and recommendations.

back side

The more responsibility, the more obligations and power. Therefore, if you received a remark about your work, it means that it is valuable. Let’s say there were never any complaints against you, no one paid attention to your work and knowledge, how would you feel? What level would your self-esteem be? A person cannot develop and improve only on praise, otherwise his perception of the world around him will be distorted.

Therefore, try to maintain your ambitions, if they want to help you by pointing out shortcomings, perceive each mistake as a zone of proximal development that you need to work on in order to become more perfect and experienced. Refrain from making excuses, they will not help at all, it is better to start correcting the situation as quickly as possible.

Where to start if you want to constructively criticize your opponent

Before building a dialogue, count to 10 and determine your motives; if they are aimed at benefit and help, express your point of view and be sure to justify it with arguments, but if they arose for the sake of your self-affirmation, then it is better to remain silent.

Your remarks should not sound like an accusation - you are not in court, and your colleague is not the accused. Reason, talk about shortcomings, but do it with respect and friendliness. There is a “sandwich rule” that says - when discussing, praise your interlocutor, then point out the shortcomings, and then again say a few compliments.

Rules for constructive criticism

In order for your judgments to appear objective, you must adhere to the following recommendations.

• Prepare carefully for the conversation, think through all its details in advance.
• Find the right moment. You need to create all the conditions for comfortable communication; there must be a calm environment so that no external irritants disturb you, and there are no unnecessary people present.
• Determine whether the interlocutor wants to contact you. Don’t be intrusive, ask him what he’s doing, if he has a free minute, in case he’s very busy.
• Praise him at the beginning of the conversation. And the opponent will not take the comments so painfully.
• Speak sincerely from the heart, be gentle. For example: “I’m upset that you left yesterday without saying goodbye, I was worried, don’t do that again.”
• If you are overwhelmed with joyful or negative emotions, try to contain them. It is better to express judgments in an even and calm voice.
• Never criticize a person. You should evaluate not him, but his work and actions.
• Motivate him, tell him about your mistakes, bad experiences in any business.
• Be more specific, clearly formulate your thoughts: “I want you to stop misbehaving in class, this is a violation of the rules, you are interfering with the lessons.”
• Prepare yourself, because the interlocutor may flare up, object, or behave aggressively. In such a situation, you need to remain calm, walk away from the conversation, and then continue when your opponent has calmed down.
• If the communication was successful, end it on a positive note. Say: “You have come such a long way to achieve your goal, it is not easy, you should not give up, you are such a smart and capable person.”

You must understand that in front of you is a living person who has her own advantages and disadvantages, your thoughtless words can hurt and offend her, therefore, if you wish her well, try to objectively express your point of view.

Constructive criticism algorithm: basic steps

I will list step-by-step instructions on what should be done so that your opinion is adequately perceived by the other side. If this is a dialogue between a boss and a subordinate, the manager must adhere to the following algorithm.

1. Formulate the specific task that you have set for your interlocutor.
2. Next, explain to him reasonably and in detail what he was wrong about and what he did wrong.
3. Tell him that you are on his side, make him understand this in every possible way.
4. Support your colleague, reassure him, say a few compliments and send him to correct the shortcomings.

It is necessary to treat your subordinates with understanding, because the greater the motivation, the higher the productivity. Yelling and insults will make no employee work harder or more attentively.

Ask a question

Relevance

Now let's talk about those cases where your assessment or judgment is not implied by professional status. For example, you want to express your opinion to your loved one, brother, parents or girlfriend

It is very important here to understand whether your comment will be relevant, timely and useful

The first point is - do you know everything about your logs? As the proverb says: he will notice a speck in someone else’s eye, but in his own... In order to give appropriate and constructive advice and assessments, you need to understand that you do not have the right to criticize a person for actions that you yourself commit. What does it mean?

For example, your mother bought an expensive but completely useless thing. Of course, you immediately have a desire to express your opinion, say how thoughtlessly she acted, and so on. Stop and ask yourself: have I made similar purchases in my life? If the answer is “yes,” then you have no moral right to condemn the mother for her actions.

The second point is how does the action of the person about whom you want to make a comment concern you personally? It is extremely important here to learn to distinguish between things that you simply do not like and you can calmly express this to your loved one and actions that go beyond your personal boundaries. For example, your sister decided to buy a car with money from her inheritance.

Expensive, beautiful, but completely impractical. This situation specifically does not concern you in any way, it is her personal choice, her decision and her responsibility. You can simply express your doubts in a very soft and tactful manner. But you have no right to criticize in such a situation

For example, your sister decided to buy a car with money from her inheritance. Expensive, beautiful, but completely impractical. This situation specifically does not concern you in any way, it is her personal choice, her decision and her responsibility. You can simply express your doubts in a very soft and tactful manner. But you have no right to criticize in such a situation.

The third point - do you know for sure that it will be better differently? If you are not a professional in the field in which you are going to give advice, then it is better to remain silent. Remember that your experience may work well for you, but it may not always work well for the other person. You may have different goals, dreams, desires and reasons.

If you learn to analyze your assessments of others in this way before expressing them, then you can easily turn destructive condemnation of actions into healthy and useful assessment and help in improvement.

Do it right. If you understand that criticism will be appropriate, then you need to adhere to the following rules: the remark must be respectful and friendly; the purpose of your assessment should be to help the person; You should always praise a person before moving directly to analyzing mistakes.

How to respond to comments

First, realize that they help us develop if we listen to them, calmly listen to advice and extract something useful from it for ourselves.

You should not take any statement with hostility, if working on the project took you a lot of time and you put a lot of effort - this does not mean that the result of your hard work is ideal. Respond to critical comments with dignity, acceptance, and calm.

Also, you should not make excuses to critics; it is better to silently listen to advice and recommendations, answer questions if necessary, and then, after thanking all participants in the dialogue, leave the room.

Learning to criticize

All this is a reason to think about how you yourself criticize other people. And learn to do it correctly. After all, criticism is also a kind of art, a technique.

And if you understand that clearly unconstructive criticism is being directed at you, what should you do?

Don't start doubting yourself

Your self-esteem is not something that can be manipulated depending on someone else's mood. It’s worth listening: what if there is a reasonable grain in the stream of incoherent sentences? It makes sense to think about why this happened and why you became the object of unconstructive criticism. It is important to maintain emotional detachment. The critic often tries to drag you into emotions

Here it is easy to follow his example and start pouring out on your opponent what is not at all what is needed. Here, a serious conflict is not far away. You can listen to everything, and then give yourself time to think - not answer right away.

As for constructive criticism, it can be very useful. Just learn to separate the words about your actions and ideas from yourself. And then you will have good tools for growth. You can even thank the person who criticized you. This is the benefit of such criticism.

Tips for parents

I will list several recommendations that will help teach a child how to properly respond to objective and biased judgments of outsiders.

1. Convey to your child the importance of remaining calm. He should not contradict the teacher, make tearful excuses or behave aggressively.
2. Contact him often so that you know about all the abuse he is subjected to. Be honest with each other.
3. Teach him to stand up for himself and respond correctly to destructive judgments.
4. Don't raise a perfectionist and don't tell him that he is to blame for something. Bring your life experience, when you made a lot of mistakes, he should understand that every person existing in this world had to make mistakes.

Adequate perception of all comments and assessments of critics is the key to stable career and spiritual growth. Without self-improvement, you will not be able to lead your work and family life.

External assessments can be very helpful

Often we do not strive to ask others about themselves, and in vain. After all, it is often external assessment that helps us see those things that need to be improved in activity or behavior. There is always a certain “blind spot” in a person’s perception of himself. He may not be aware of many things, even if he wants to.

For example, if someone is learning to play the guitar, he might ask his tutor or other people who listened to his performance: “What can I improve in my performance?”, “Was the introduction harmonious?” and so on. So we can safely say that in many cases criticism is actually more useful than compliments.